🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered favorable results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."